auto dealer in black and red logo
MenuMENU
SearchSEARCH

FTC Issues Refunds to Buyers of Bogus "Extended Auto Warranties'

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC)'s six-year effort to collect on a $4.2 million judgement against a telemarketer of “extended auto warranties” came to a end last week. The telemarketer, which did business under the name My Car Solutions, led victims to believe it was affiliated with auto dealers and manufacturers.

July 27, 2016
3 min to read


WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Federal Trade Commission (FTC)'s six-year effort to collect on a $4.2 million judgement against a telemarketer of “extended auto warranties” came to a end last week. According to the regulator's June 2010 complaint, the comapany duped victims into paying thousands of dollars for bogus plans by leading them to believe it was afilliated with auto dealers and manufacturers.

On July 19, the Federal Trade Commission began mailing 5,970 refund checks totaling more than $4 million to victims of the illegal robocaller. The checks are the result of a judgement against Fereidoun “Fred” Khalilian and his Miami-based company, The Dolce Worldwide LLC. The business operated under the name My Car Solutions.

“Khalilian is well known to the FTC as a result of a 2001 settlement that banned him from all travel-related telemarketing, and required him to pay $185,000 in consumer redress for making deceptive pitches for travel packages,” the FTC stated in a January 2011 release announcing its settlement with the robocaller. “In June 2010, the FTC filed a new complaint against Khalilian, alleging that since 2009, he and his company marketed ‘extended’ auto warranties by blasting consumers with pre-recorded robocalls.”

The calls, according to the FTC, warned people that their warranties were about to expire and instructed them to “press one” to talk with a representative. Consumers were then transferred to telemarketers who say they were from the “service contract department.” The telemarketers would then “verify” information about the consumers’ cars and “confirm” other information, including ZIP code.

The telemarketers then transferred consumers to a “senior specialist,” who allegedly made more misrepresentations. Only after consumers bought the warranties did they discover My Car Solution was not affiliated with their dealer or car manufacturer, and that the contracts did not cover “the entire engine,” did not provide “bumper-to-bumper” coverage, and excluded certain “pre-existing conditions.”

Consumers who tried to get their money back — typically between $1,300 and $2,485 per warranty — found it nearly impossible. And according to the FTC, no one received an actual warranty extension.

Filed in January 2011 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, the final court order settling the FTC’s charges banned the defendants from telemarketing or helping others telemarket. It also prohibited them from making any misrepresentations or omissions when selling any goods or services, and included the $4.2 million monetary judgment.

Additionally, Khalilian was required to turn over corporate and personal property totaling approximately $50,000. The court order also authorized the FTC to take action to collect the remainder of the outstanding judgment from the defendants.

Rust Consulting Inc. served as the refund administrators in the case. The checks must be cashed by victims within 60 days or they will become void.   

Originally posted on F&I and Showroom

More Compliance

two cars on a billboard, No Hidden Fees
ComplianceMay 1, 2026

Dealer Ads and the FTC

The agency has made it clear in recent enforcement actions and warnings, in auto retail and other industries, that advertised prices must include all nonoptional costs to the consumer.

Read More →
Complianceby StaffFebruary 4, 2026

AAMS Training and Mosaic Compliance Services Merge

The strategic combination is intended to expand technology-driven compliance solutions for the automotive industry.

Read More →
ComplianceOctober 6, 2025

The Jurisprudence of Pricing

Legal concept helps makes sense of California’s recently passed version of the failed federal CARS legislation.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
ComplianceJuly 17, 2025

Trump 2.0 and Enforcement Priorities

The upshot is don’t relax, because regulation indeed continues.

Read More →
Blue and white Automotive Service Professionals logo presented over a blue background with various wrench tools.
Fixed Opsby StaffJune 11, 2025

June Is Automotive Service Professionals Month

Observance is opportunity to thank technicians for their crucial role in auto retail.

Read More →
Complianceby StaffJanuary 30, 2025

Cox Automotive Releases Compliance Guide

New edition walks auto dealers through relevant regulations for 2025.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Complianceby StaffDecember 24, 2024

Trump 2.0 and Retail Automotive

Administration’s plans should generally bode well for the industry.

Read More →
Complianceby StaffOctober 17, 2024

CARS Rule Update: 5th Circuit Oral Arguments Recap

In this video, Jim Ganther of Mosaic Compliance Services, recaps the key takeaways from the oral arguments in the critical CARS Rule case, including potential outcomes and what dealers should do to stay ahead of compliance changes.

Read More →
ComplianceSeptember 19, 2024

State of the CARS Rule, Part 3

The players in the automotive industry should coordinate their responses to this pending regulation.

Read More →
Ad Loading...

The Future of Car Dealer Documents

Where forms, documents, agreements and contracts could be in 50 years.

Read More →